OSHA Proposes Nationwide Workplace Heat Safety Standard

Page 2 of 2

OSHA Proposes Nationwide Workplace Heat Safety Standard

The proposed rule also will require employers to implement acclimatization protocols upon the Initial Heat Trigger for new workers and workers returning after an absence of 14 days or more. Employers can choose between applying the High Heat Trigger measures (discussed below) for the employee’s first week on the job, even if the heat index does not exceed 90 degrees Fahrenheit or gradual acclimatization, according to a schedule recommended by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH).


Additional safety measures required when the High Heat Trigger is met (a heat index of 90 degrees Fahrenheit) include: 

  • Mandatory, paid 15-minute rest breaks at least every two hours in break areas with cooling measures
  • Observation of employees for signs and symptoms of heat-related illness, such as a mandatory “buddy system” or observation by a supervisor or heat safety coordinator
  • A hazard alert to remind employees of the importance of drinking water, taking rest breaks and how to seek help
  • Warning signs at indoor work areas with ambient temperatures that regularly exceed 120 degrees.

Employers will need to train all employees on heat safety prior to any work at or above the initial heat trigger. The proposed rule also requires annual refresher training and supplemental training after certain heat-related injuries or illnesses at the work site. 

The proposed rule is available at www.osha.gov/heat-exposure/rulemaking, but it has not yet been officially published in the Federal Register. Its publication will trigger a 120-day public comment period, after which OSHA will consider the comments and hold an informal public hearing before publishing a final rule.

The rule’s future likely will hinge upon who wins the presidential race, as a Republican administration may be likely to abandon the rulemaking process (if it is not final).

If the rule takes effect, it will face increased scrutiny in light of the US Supreme Court’s decision in Loper Bright v. Raimondo. Loper Bright overturned the longstanding Chevron deference doctrine, which permitted an agency’s interpretation of ambiguous statutory language to stand as long as it was deemed a reasonable interpretation of the implementing statute.

OSHA relies on its interpretation of the OSH Act to justify its workplace standards, including the proposed heat standard. In the OSH Act, Congress authorized OSHA to promulgate workplace health and safety standards “whenever the Secretary [of Labor]…determined that a rule should be promulgated in order to serve the objectives of this Act.” 29 U.S.C. § 655(b). 

Courts historically have deferred to OSHA’s authority, including on the basis of Chevron deference. Loper Bright will allow employers to challenge new OSHA standards as exceeding OSHA’s authority under the OSH Act. For example, an employer could argue that a particular OSHA standard does not advance the health and safety of workers and therefore exceeds OSHA’s statutory authority. While courts would have previously deferred to OSHA’s reasonable statutory interpretations, such deference no longer applies. In a 2020 case, the DC Circuit specifically held that Chevron entitled the Secretary of Labor to deference with respect to the applicability of a safety-standard regarding eyewash stations to construction industry employers, even though, as originally passed, the regulations only applied to federal contractors. Kiewit Power Constructors Co. v. Sec'y of Lab., U.S. Dep't of Lab., 959 F.3d 381, 385 (D.C. Cir. 2020). Such deference would no longer protect OSHA after Loper Bright.

Many observers expect challenges to the proposed rule. Assuming these challenges materialize, courts will apply their own judgment when assessing whether the proposed standard comports with the legislative delegations of authority in the OSH Act.


About the Authors

Susan F. Wiltsie is a partner with Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and can be reached at [email protected].


Elizabeth England is an associate with Hunton Andrews Kurth LLP and can be reached at [email protected].


Product Showcase

  • Magid® D-ROC® GPD412 21G Ultra-Thin Polyurethane Palm Coated Work Gloves

    Magid’s 21G line is more than just a 21-gauge glove, it’s a revolutionary knitting technology paired with an advanced selection of innovative fibers to create the ultimate in lightweight cut protection. The latest offering in our 21G line provides ANSI A4 cut resistance with unparalleled dexterity and extreme comfort that no other 21-gauge glove on the market can offer! Read More

  • SECUPRO MARTEGO

    FOR HIGHEST DEMANDS. A cutting tool in which function and design go hand in hand. Meet the SECUPRO MARTEGO, our prize-winning squeeze-grip safety knife with fully automatic retractable blade for safety. • Ergonomically friendly trigger mechanism to engage the blade • Durable body made of aluminum • Safer alternative to fixed blade utility knives for general cutting tasks • 9 mm Cutting depth • Easy, tool free blade change Dimensions: L 6.10" L x 0.71" W x 1.91" H Weight: 3.70 oz Cutting Depth: 9 mm Read More

  • HAZ LO HEADLAMPS

    With alkaline or rechargeable options, these safety rated, Class 1, Div. 1 Headlamps provide long runtime with both spot and flood options in the same light. Work safely and avoid trip hazards with flexible hands-free lighting from Streamlight. Read More

Featured

Artificial Intelligence